Environmental Pollution Studies · Accra, Ghana

What the soil knows, we can fix together.

In January 2023, I pulled sixteen soil samples from schoolyards, markets, and scrapyards within two kilometres of the Agbogbloshie e-waste site in Accra. The soil told a clear story about lead and copper — and an even clearer one about why no single actor can solve this alone.

KORLE-BU 5.5399, −0.2332 KORLE-GONNO 5.5386, −0.2225 ABOSSEY OKAI 5.5534, −0.2249 OLD FADAMA 5.5439, −0.2213

The gradient

Four zones, one pattern: contamination tracks activity, not geography.

15 MEAN PPM

Korle-Bu

No recycling activity · farthest zone

227 MEAN PPM

Korle-Gonno

Schools near burning sites

357 MEAN PPM

Abossey Okai

Former recycling area, cleared 2021

2,168 MEAN PPM

Old Fadama

Active burning & dismantling

Core depth is scaled to mean concentration (square-root scale, so the smaller values stay visible). For context: the U.S. EPA treats bare residential soil at or above 400 ppm lead in children's play areas as a soil hazard. Old Fadama's mean lead level is more than five times that threshold — and Abossey Okai still nearly reaches it years after recycling there stopped.

The story

This isn't a story about villains. It's a story about a chain — and every link can help.

It's easy to tell the Agbogbloshie story as an accusation: rich countries dump, poor countries burn, everyone points at someone else. That version is emotionally satisfying and practically useless. The version the data supports is different — and more hopeful.

A chain we all hold

Every phone, laptop, and television passes through many hands before it becomes waste: designers, manufacturers, consumers, exporters, shippers, scrap dealers, recyclers. The world now generates a record 62 million tonnes of e-waste a year, and less than a quarter of it is documented as properly collected and recycled. The metals inside — an estimated $91 billion worth in 2022 alone — mostly go unrecovered. Nobody designed this outcome. It's what happens when each link in the chain optimizes alone.

The recyclers are not the problem — they're part of the solution

Tens of thousands of people work in and around Agbogbloshie. They are, in effect, urban miners: skilled at recovering copper, aluminium, and steel that would otherwise be lost. The problem is not that they recycle — it's that they've been left to do it with fire and bare hands, without protective equipment, handwashing stations, or safer tools. My survey of the site found no PPE in use and no exposure controls of any kind. That is not a moral failure of workers; it's an infrastructure gap that partnerships can close.

The soil in Abossey Okai carries a warning: enforcement alone doesn't heal the ground. Recycling there was cleared out in 2021, yet lead and copper remain strongly enriched today.

What the soil taught me about blame

The contamination gradient in my data — Old Fadama, then Abossey Okai, then Korle-Gonno, then Korle-Bu — maps precisely onto where burning and dismantling happen, not onto who lives where. And Abossey Okai, where recycling was banned and cleared, still shows severe enrichment. Removing the workers didn't remove the metals. Heavy metals persist for generations. So the question isn't "who do we punish?" It's "who does what next?" — remediation, safer recycling infrastructure, and upstream design changes, all at once.

Collaboration is already happening

The encouraging part: the pieces exist. Ghana's Hazardous and Electronic Waste Control Act established a national framework and an eco-levy to fund sound e-waste management. International partners have worked with Ghana's EPA and local scrap dealer associations on safer dismantling facilities and training at Agbogbloshie. The Basel Convention gives countries a shared legal language for transboundary waste. And the UN's own analysis is blunt on this point: meaningful progress in collection and recycling depends on collaboration between the formal and informal sectors — bringing recyclers in, not pushing them out.

Where you fit in

If you're a researcher: the health-impact studies that should follow soil studies like mine still need doing, ideally with Ghanaian institutions leading. If you work in electronics: design for repair and take-back. If you're a policymaker: fund remediation, not just enforcement — the Abossey Okai finding shows why. And if you're a consumer: your device's afterlife is part of its footprint. Keep it longer, repair it, and recycle it through documented channels. The chain only works when every link does.

Read the full study

Environmental Pollution Assessment of Metals in Soils Surrounding the Agbogbloshie E‑waste Dump Site in Accra, Ghana

Soil samples from four zones within a 2 km radius of Agbogbloshie were analyzed by XRF for six heavy metals of concern. Lead and copper showed extremely severe enrichment and extreme contamination (Enrichment Factor and Geo‑accumulation Index) in the active recycling zone, with a clear gradient tracking recycling activity. Full methods, tables, and pollution indices are in the paper.

Download the paper (PDF) — coming soon Unpublished master's thesis · shared for research & education
AUTHOR — Roland Abuntori
ADVISER — Dr. John Spengler
FIELD WORK — January 2023, Accra
METHOD — XRF analysis · EF · Igeo
SAMPLES — 16 sites · 4 zones · 34 elements
STATUS — Unpublished thesis
CITE AS — Abuntori, R. (2023). Environmental pollution assessment of metals in the soils of areas surrounding the Agbogbloshie e‑waste dump site in Accra, Ghana. [Unpublished master's thesis].

Research library

Go deeper: key research on e‑waste

A curated set of the sources that shaped this study, plus the most important global data. All links go to the original publishers; some journal articles may sit behind a paywall.

Global data & policy

  • The Global E‑waste Monitor 2024 — the definitive global dataset: 62 Mt generated in 2022, ~22% documented as properly recycled.ITU · UNITAR · Global E‑waste Statistics Partnership
  • The Basel Convention — the international treaty governing transboundary movements of hazardous waste, including e‑waste.United Nations Environment Programme
  • Children and Digital Dumpsites — WHO's landmark report on e‑waste exposure and child health.World Health Organization, 2021

Health effects of e‑waste exposure

Agbogbloshie & Ghana studies

Methods used in this study